Discussion:
the usenet arrests and incestuous pedophiles >was Re: ping "Girl-Lover" Randy Kehrt
(too old to reply)
ThePsyko
2008-04-03 16:55:11 UTC
Permalink
On 03 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called alt.callahans and heard David
On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:03:37 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:14:23 -0800, "R. Steve Walz"
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 06:37:12 -0700 (PDT), nudist_emy
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:29:35 -0800, "R. Steve Walz"
TWO year olds?
Investigators said the images depict children as young as 2
and 3 years old involved in sexual activity.
"This is a case of raw, hard-core, sickening pornography,"
Metro Police Crimes Against Children Unit Capt. Steve
Thompson said. "Babies and children are the truest victims."
--------------------
Why is this here?
It isn't related to anything we support.
It's off topic!
What *ARE* you talking about..It's perfectly on topic
According to the Assistant Director of the FBI it's quite usual
for incestuous pedophile parents to be supplying pornography
using their own children ..
you have supported emy and feel it quite acceptable for an adult
pedophile to masturbate on the chest of an eight year old
child..
...right?
TOP DOGS EXPLAIN USENET ARRESTS
http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2007/s2181361.htm
-----------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------
TONY JONES: We've heard that 20 children have actually been
rescued during the course of this operation from abuse. How were
these children being accessed by the people inside this tight
inner sanctum?
J. STEPHEN TIDWELL: Well, unfortunately, as your folks found
out, as they did their background on it, in many cases it was
the paedophile's own children, which is not uncommon for it to
begin there.
____________________________________________________________
FYI role of folk like you and David Simpson in encouraging it
is known to them too..
_________________________________________________________________
_ J. STEPHEN TIDWELL: It truly is an extraordinary admission.
And as Jon was saying, it was a significant criminal enterprise
with global reach that required the kind of dedicated effort
amongst the partners, agencies and partner countries, who were
committed to making sure that we come after them and we come
after them relentlessly.
TONY JONES: Jon Rouse, when they are talking to each other
online, this group, how did they justify to themselves even, the
actions that they were doing - the commissioning of pornography,
the participation in it?
JON ROUSE: Tony, it's probably very difficult for members of the
public to understand child sex offender psychology, it's very
difficult for us to understand it.
If I could equate it to this, there's certainly discussions that
we've detected within the group where they believe that their
time will come again, that time will come when sexual
relationships between adults and children will be accepted by
the community.
And I've seen discussions within the group where they talk about
the fact that largely across the world now homosexual
relationships are accepted by the community.
They believe that time will come again for them. And they know
that they're persecuted. There are certainly some text grabs
that I can read to you where they talk about this war against
law enforcement, and how they hold their position against us.
TONY JONES: Please go ahead if you have something with you,
please go ahead.
JON ROUSE: Okay. Well one of the satisfying things that we've
achieved in this operation was monitoring them and knowing that,
I heard Ross Barnett and a number of others talk about rescuing
children.
The child sex offenders in this network and I'll read a passage
of some of their text, they talk about LEA. LEA is a term that
we use for ourselves, law enforcement agencies.
another irrelevant post from brandon.
The activities of incestuous pedophiles and the way you use
newsgroup to enable your depravity is far from irrelevant.
You ought to check what irrelevant means...
Your boasting about your father's activities and your explanations
of how they are just fine is exactly what the police are
referring to.
nobody condones non-consensual
sex.
No *that* opinion is indeed irrelevant..and clearly untrue..
Your father's sex crimes are no less sex crimes
because you were successfully groomed..
--------------------------------
You're a deluded shit-minded little damaged paranoid.
You imagine that to engage in and enjoy pleasurable consensual sex,
a child or teen would have to be brainwashed, which is stupid.
We are talking of parents sexually exploiting their children
If ..like nudist_emy's parents they bring their children up to believe
that having sex with your parents is normal ..that is certainly
brainwashing a child.
That at your age you are proud of your father's erection
as he sexually violates an eight year old child proves how
successfully..
-------------------------------------
If the child liked it then it cannot BE "violation".
Don't be ridiculous..any adult having sex with a eight year old
child is violating it..
Why do you lie. He did not have sex with the eight-year-old. According
to what I read he didn't touch her.
A grown man masturbates onto an 8 year old girls chest and you defend it
with "he didn't touch her" ??

and you wonder why people call you an apologist and sympathizer...
--
ThePsyko
Public Enemy #7

**Pissing off the planet, one person at a time**
Kali
2008-04-03 21:17:47 UTC
Permalink
In <***@nntp.petitmorte.net>, ThePsyko
***@itookmyprozac.com said:
: On 03 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called alt.callahans and heard David
: cry out in news:***@4ax.com...
:
: > On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:03:37 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
: > <***@example.net> typed furiously:
: >
: >>On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:14:23 -0800, "R. Steve Walz"
: >><***@armory.com> wrote:

[...]

: >>>> That at your age you are proud of your father's erection
: >>>> as he sexually violates an eight year old child proves how
: >>>> successfully..
: >>>-------------------------------------
: >>>If the child liked it then it cannot BE "violation".

Yes, eight year-old little girls love being sexually violated by
balding old men and keeping their dirty little secrets. They
love pornography and letting daddy ejaculate on them. Sure. Just
like Disneyworld.

: >>Don't be ridiculous..any adult having sex with a eight year old
: >>child is violating it..

An eight year-old isn't emotionally or physically mature enough
to consent to sex, regardless of the justifications pedophiles
make in order to feel less guilt over their behavior.

: > Why do you lie. He did not have sex with the eight-year-old. According
: > to what I read he didn't touch her.
:
: A grown man masturbates onto an 8 year old girls chest and you defend it
: with "he didn't touch her" ??
:
: and you wonder why people call you an apologist and sympathizer...

...or worse.
--
Kali
§ñühw¤£f
2008-04-04 15:46:27 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:17:47 -0400
Post by Kali
: On 03 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called alt.callahans and heard David
: > On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:03:37 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
: >
: >>On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:14:23 -0800, "R. Steve Walz"
[...]
: >>>> That at your age you are proud of your father's erection
: >>>> as he sexually violates an eight year old child proves how
: >>>> successfully..
: >>>-------------------------------------
: >>>If the child liked it then it cannot BE "violation".
Yes, eight year-old little girls love being sexually violated by
balding old men and keeping their dirty little secrets. They
love pornography and letting daddy ejaculate on them. Sure. Just
like Disneyworld.
Well thanks for the heads up.
I'll avoid Djisney World!

--
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/04/03/another-kbr-rape-claim-emerges/
Loading...